Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:44
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Full ‘Squid Game’ Season 3 Trailer Teases a Wild and Violent End - Gizmodo
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Yuen: When cancer struck a second time, she found ‘euphoria’ - Star Tribune
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
What are the best sunscreens for oily acne prone skin?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Can the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) be reversed?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What ended your relationship with your best friend?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.